YOON&YANG
Tae Ho Son Partner
손태호 변호사.jpg
  • TEL 82 2 6003 7109
  • FAX 82 2 6003 7012
  • E-MAIL
Tae Ho Son is a partner at Yoon & Yang LLC and his main practice area is administrative disputes.
Based on 20-year experience as a judge, Mr. Son successfully represents clients at litigations. In particular, he has expertise in the administrative law and administrative litigations. He also provides government agencies and other public institutions with legal services, while handling constitutional litigations for them at the same time.

Experience

  • 2004-present Yoon & Yang LLC
  • 2014-present Member, Korea Administrative Law and Practice Association
  • 2013-present Member, Korea Public Administration Case Study Association
  • 2012-present Chairman, Administrative Law Community, Seoul Bar Association
  • 2007-13 Commissioner, Administrative Appeals Commission under the Prime Minister
  • 2002-04 Presiding Judge, Seoul Central District Court
  • 2002-03 Director of Arbitration, Press Arbitration Commission, 3rd Seoul Arbitration Section
  • 2000-02 Presiding Judge, Suwon District Court
  • 1996-00 Judicial Researcher, Supreme Court
  • 1994-96 Judge, Seoul High Court
  • 1993-94 Judge, Daegu High Court
  • 1991-93 Judge, Gimcheon Branch of Daegu District Court
  • 1989-91 Judge, Seoul District Criminal Court
  • 1986-89 Judge, Seoul Civil District Court
  • 1983-86 Judge Advocate, Republic of Korea Air Force

Education

  • 2015 Seoul National University Graduate School of Law, LL.M.
  • 1999 Antitrust Law Research Program, SNU Law Research Institute (coursework completed)
  • 1991-92 University of Washington, School of Law, Visiting Scholar
  • 1983 Judicial Research and Training Institute
  • 1980 Seoul National University College of Law, LL.B.

Publications

  • “Deference for Administrative Agencies in Interpretation of Laws in the Process of Administrative Litigation – Centering on Anglo-American Laws”, 2015
  • “Urban Development Project upon Designation of Combined Urban Development District”, Construction Law Seminar 18 (Study on Land Use Plan of Development Projects), 2022
  • “Regulations on Apartments and Officetels”, Construction Law Seminar 17 (Study on the Building Act and the Housing Act), 2021
  • “Cultural District and District Unit Plant”, Construction Law Seminar 16 (Study on District Unit Plan), 2021
  • “Urban Parks (Hannam Neighborhood Park)”, Construction Law Seminar 15 (Study on Urban Planning Facilities), 2020
  • “Administrative Litigation on Construction of Law at Administrative Litigation (Commentary on Supreme Court Decision 2016Du55490 rendered on March 15, 2017)” Law Times, May 28, 2018
  • “Amorphous Concepts and Judicial Deference (Commentary on Supreme Court en banc decision No. 2017Du48956 rendered on October 12, 2017)”, Yoon & Yang Analysis of Administrative Decisions, 2018
  • “Legality of Regulations on Business Days of Large Discount Stores (Commentary on Supreme Court en banc decision No. 2015Du295 rendered on November 19, 2015)”, Yoon & Yang Analysis of Administrative Decisions, 2016
  • “Legal Nature of Notification for Revocation of Decoration”, Yoon & Yang Analysis of Administrative Decisions, 2016
  • “Blanket Auction and Statutory Surface Right,” Civil Action Issues, vol. 10, April 2000
  • “Whether the So-called ‘Indirect Bill’ Debts Are Included in the Secured Debts of Geun Mortgage in Bank Loan Transactions,” Supreme Court Decision Commentary, Issue 33, May 2000
  • “Whether the Claim Assignor’s Expenditure with Fund Earned in Claim Payment Prior to Notification of Claim Assignment Constitutes Embezzlement,” Supreme Court Decision Commentary, Issue 32, October 1999
  • “Doctor’s Criminal Liability for Nurses’ Negligence,” Supreme Court Decision Commentary, Issue 31, May 1999
  • “Delegation of the Education Superintendent’s Right to Approve Cancellation of Officer Appointment at Education Foundations,” People and Judiciary: In Memory of Retirement of Chief Justice Gwan Yun, January 1999
  • “Whether the Disposition, by the Education Superintendent’s Delegate under the Rules, to Cancel the Approval of Appointment of an Education Foundation’s Officer Is Invalid?,” Supreme Court Decision Commentary, Issue 29, June 1998
  • “Meaning of Article 26(1)(iii) of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act—‘Acts of Unreasonably Restricting the Business Contents or Activities of Member Enterprisers,’” Supreme Court Decision Commentary, Issue 28, December 1997
  • “Legality of Disposition to Impose Additional Fees after Expiration of Port Facility Use Period,” Supreme Court Decision Commentary, Issue 27, July 1997
  • “Acquisition Date of Land Substitution as Housing Site,” Supreme Court Decision Commentary, Issue 26, December 1996
  • “Possibility of Acceptance of Military Supplies,” Supreme Court Decision Commentary, Issue 25, November 1996
  • “The U.S. Traffic Law Violation Punishment System—Focused on the System of Handling Traffic Rule Violation Cases,” Material for Trial, vol. 73, December 1996
  • “Crime of Loss of Military Supplies,” Collection of Military Act Papers, vol. 4, January 1985